First Lifetime Back Pain and Physiatry Treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of psychological factors in recovery from first lifetime low back pain (LBP) was explored in this study. Consecutive clients from one physiatry clinic in Montreal who had LBP of less than 3 months' duration, were on sick leave and receiving workers' compensation benefits, and reported the current event as first lifetime LBP were enrolled. Psychological factors that fluctuate with current events (Psychiatric Symptom Index) and remain stable over time (General Well Being Scale) were assessed. Outcomes were late return to work (> 31 days) and 1 year incidence of compensated recurrence. Results from two multivariate models indicated lower psychological distress predicted late return to work, and higher well being, higher aggressiveness, and lower anxiety predicted compensated recurrence. Researchers concluded psychological factors do not impact clients with all types of LBP in the same way. For individuals lacking prior LBP experience, better psychological functioning increased lengthy work absence. Thus, awareness of the clients' psychological profiles and previous LBP experiences may benefit recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".