Impaired Left Ventricular Reserve in Childhood Cancer Survivors Treated With Anthracycline Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors show evidence of diffuse myocardial fibrosis that is related to exercise capacity. The mechanism of reduced exercise tolerance in anthracycline cardiotoxicity remains unclear. We explored the determinants of exercise intolerance by evaluating left ventricular (LV) distensibility and functional reserve. METHODS: Patients (n = 22) and healthy controls (n = 10) underwent two-dimensional echocardiography while supine, upright, and during cycle exercise. LV distensibility was measured as the change in end-diastolic cavity area (EDCA) from supine to the upright position. LV functional reserve was assessed during peak exercise, and measured as the exercise-induced change in systolic circumferential strain rate (SR) and early-diastolic SR (EDSR). The peak rate of oxygen consumption was measured by indirect calorimetry. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 16 years (range 8-19) and controls 14 years (range 8-19). Median time since anthracycline therapy was 6 years (range 2-16). Peak oxygen consumption was significantly lower in patients compared to controls (35 ml/kg/min [28-60] vs. 45 ml/kg/min [44-53], P = 0.005). Transitioning from the supine position to the upright position caused a similar reduction in LV EDCA, suggesting similar LV distensibility between patients (-22% [-46 to -4]) and controls (-20% [-46 to -3], P = 0.3). However, during exercise, both systolic SR and EDSR reserve were significantly impaired in patients (∆SR: 93% [14-308], ∆EDSR: -4.5% [-88 to 121]) compared to controls (∆SR: 128% [54-230], P = 0.046; ∆EDSR: 74% [22-234], P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that impaired LV contractility and functional reserve play a role in the reduced exercise capacity in anthracycline cardiotoxicity rather than LV distensibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".