Il valore della tecnica per lo sviluppo integrale della persona umana nella "Caritas in Veritate"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article reflects upon the social doctrine of the Catholic Church on the value of the technique. The first part presents the value of the technique according to one of the main do-cuments of the Second Vatican Council,“Gaudium et Spes” The Council is very open to the use of the techique of the real development of men and societies if the technique respects God’s plan for man and is at the service of the person. In the Encyclical Pope Benedict XVI “Caritas in Ve-ritate,” we find a whole chapter, the last one, on this subject. Here the Pope begins the reflec-tion on the technique at the basis of the major horizon of the anthropological, spiritual and ethi-cal perspectives. Then he presents four items in which the use of the technique offers important ethical aspects for Christian life and the life of the Church: peace, mass media, bioethics and psychology. Specially, this last aspect is really new, as considered in a Papal Encyclical of so-cial doctrine. To give an integral response to all the questions which have arisen in all these fields, it is important to have a solid point of reference and an integral anthropology that does not deny the existence and value of human spirituality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".