MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2415037494

The distinct HERG missense mutation L564P causes long QT syndrome in one French Canadian family.

2000· article· en· W2415037494 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julie St‐Pierre, Nadine Van Roy, L Blier, E Plante, Jacqueline Cote, Matthew K. Gilbert, Mohamed Chahine

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordshERGMissense mutationQT intervalMedicineLong QT syndromeTorsades de pointesMutationSudden deathMutantShort QT syndromeGeneticsPotassium channelInternal medicineCardiologyBiologyGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Long QT syndrome is a congenital abnormality of cardiac repolarization causing syncope and sudden death from ventricular tachyarrhythmias known as torsades de pointes. This hereditary cardiac disorder often shows an increase of the value of the QT interval corrected for heart rate over 0.45 s in a 12-lead electrocardiogram. OBJECTIVE: To find and identify pertinent mutations occurring in French Canadians by extracting genomic DNA from blood samples and performing a combination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), single-strand conformational polymorphism and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: A novel mutation was identified in the S5 region of the HERG potassium channel. In codon 564 CTA, T was replaced by C, resulting in a leucine to proline substitution. Two family members had the mutation in two distinct generations. A new restriction site was created at this position and therefore enabled the development of a rapid diagnostic test using PCR. HERG wild type and mutant potassium channel mRNAs were then expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. CONCLUSION: This electrophysiological study suggests that coexpression of HERG wild type and mutant L564P results in a dominant negative effect of the mutation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→