MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415055059

Plenary lecture 1: utilization of non-fossil fuel energy options to mitigate climate change and environmental impact

2009· article· en· W2415055059 on OpenAlexaff
Marc A. Rosen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Energy & Environment · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyFossil fuelEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental impact of the energy industryEnergy carrierGreenhouse gasClimate change mitigationEnergy developmentEfficient energy useEnergy engineeringWaste managementEngineeringEnergy policyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-fossil fuel energy options can help humanity combat climate change and provide the opportunity for sustainable energy solutions. Non-fossil fuel energy options are diverse, ranging from renewables like solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower, biomass, ocean, tidal and wave energy, through to nuclear energy. The latter may not be a renewable resource, but it avoids greenhouse gas emissions and thus contributes to efforts to avoid climate change. Renewable energy resources are normally free of greenhouse gas emissions, although some like biomass can lead to such emissions if not managed carefully. Non-fossil fuel energy options are not sufficient for avoiding climate change, in that they are not necessarily readily utilizable in their natural forms. Hydrogen energy systems are needed to facilitate the use of non-fossil fuels by allowing them to be converted to two main classes of energy carriers: hydrogen and select hydrogen-derived fuels and electricity. The former allow humanity to meet most of its chemical energy needs, while the latter can satisfy most non-chemical energy demands. High efficiency is also needed to allow the greatest benefits to be attained from all energy options, including nonfossil fuel ones, in terms of climate change and other factors. Efficiency improvements efforts have many dimensions, including energy conservation, improved energy management, fuel substitution, better matching of energy carriers and energy demands, and more efficiency utilization of both energy quantity and quality. The latter two concepts are best considered via the use of exergy analysis, a thermodynamic tool based primarily on the second law of thermodynamics. A case study is considered involving the production of hydrogen from non-fossil energy sources via thermochemical water decomposition. This process is mainly driven by thermal energy, and is anticipated to be usable for large-scale hydrogen production. In thermochemical hydrogen production, a series of complex chemical and other processes occur, with the net result being the splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen. Most preliminary designs of thermochemical hydrogen production processes are based on nuclear energy and solar energy, thus providing different types of non-fossil fuel options for combating climate change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.630

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1880.133

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Energy & EnvironmentSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207