MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415228321 · doi:10.1111/jbi.12780

Biogeographical barriers to dispersal and rare gene flow shape population genetic structure in red‐footed boobies (<i>Sula sula</i>)

2016· article· en· W2415228321 on OpenAlexafffund
James A. Morris‐Pocock, David J. Anderson, Vicki L. Friesen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biogeography · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGene flowBiological dispersalBiologyPopulationGenetic structureIsolation by distanceReproductive isolationEcologyPopulation geneticsEvolutionary biologyGenetic variationGeneticsGeneDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim The ecological and biogeographical factors that influence population differentiation in seabirds are likely to be too complex and nuanced to be captured by many commonly held models of population differentiation. Pelagic seabirds exhibit high natal philopatry but can disperse long distances, potentially leading to long periods of genetic isolation with rare gene flow between isolated populations. Here, we assess levels of population genetic structure and gene flow in red‐footed boobies ( Sula sula ) to test two hypotheses: (1) terrestrial and marine barriers to gene flow have caused population genetic differentiation among red‐footed booby populations, and (2) despite high genetic differentiation among populations, rare gene flow still occurs among populations. Location Tropical oceans. Methods We genotyped 282 red‐footed boobies at microsatellite, nuclear intron and mitochondrial markers. We applied basic tests of population differentiation, such as analysis of molecular variance, and applied modern statistical phylogeographical methods (e.g., structure , BayesAss ) to investigate the history of gene flow. Results Red‐footed boobies form four major genetic populations that correspond to oceanographic regions (Atlantic, Indian, Western+Central Pacific and eastern Pacific Oceans). However, gene flow has occurred recently among these populations. Further differentiation was found within ocean basins. Although the levels of gene flow within ocean basins are more difficult to assess, gene flow appears to have occurred between genetically differentiated Indian Ocean colonies. Main conclusions The population genetic structure of red‐footed boobies has been driven primarily by major continental and marine barriers to gene flow that also drive differentiation in other pelagic seabirds (e.g., the Isthmus of Panama and eastern Pacific basin). However, dispersal across marine barriers (but not major continental barriers) appears to have been relatively common. We suggest that such patterns of long‐term isolation and rare gene flow may be common to pelagic seabirds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BiogeographySame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207