Aquinas on the Ontological and Theological Foundation of the Transcendentals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lo studio metafisico dell’ente in quanto ente e delle sue proprieta trascendentali richiede una fondazione ontologica secondo le cause intrinseche e una fondazione teologica secondo le cause estrinseche. Seguendo il metodo della risoluzione secundum rationem , l’Aquinate fonda le proprieta trascendentali dell’ ens in se (res, unum ) e le proprieta trascendentali dell’ ens in ordine ad aliud ( aliquid, verum, bonum ) sulla composizione reale dell’essenza e dell’ actus essendi nelle creature. La fondazione teologica segue il metodo della resolutio secundum rem e coinvolge le nozioni di partecipazione trascendentale e causalita analogica. La predicazione analogica dei trascendentali di Dio e delle creature e fondata sui rapporti di causalita estrinseca (efficiente, esemplare e finale). Si vede che ogni trascendentali coinvolge una linea causale predominante: ad esempio, l’unum e la causalita efficiente, il verum e la causalita esemplare, il bonum e la causalita finale. Res e aliquid anche hanno fondazioni teologiche: una creatura e res a causa della determinazione esemplare della sua essenza ed e aliquid a causa della distinzione e della diversita effettuata nelle creature per le idee divine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".