The response of human breast tumour cell lines with altered polymerase beta levels to cisplatin and radiation.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MCF 7 (human breast carcinoma cells) and mutants transfected with the DNA polymerase beta gene were tested for response to cisplatin, radiation and combined treatments. The transfected cells showed a higher level of polymerase beta activity and were more resistant to radiation and cisplatin compared to the parental cell line. Further studies showed that for isosurvival treatments the mutant cells were more effective in sublethal radiation damage repair compared to the parental line. The combination of cisplatin with radiation showed effective radiosensitization which was less in the mutants compared to the parental line. In addition, the sequence of cisplatin before irradiation was more effective then cisplabn after irradiation. Pre-exposure to low levels of cisplatin for up to 24 h before irradiation showed a small significant adaptive response in one mutant line at 8 h and while similar trends were observed in the parental lines at earlier times they were not significant. In summary our data show that polymerase beta and thus base excision repair may play a role in cellular responses to cisplatin and radiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".