MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415759068

WISE 2005: altered cerebrovascular autoregulation after 60 day head-down bed rest.

2007· article· en· W2415759068 on OpenAlexaff
Danielle K. Greaves, Phillipe Arbeille, Richard L. Hughson

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpaceflight effects on biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBed restOrthostatic vital signsMedicinePresyncopeSupine positionCerebral autoregulationCardiologyCerebral blood flowBlood pressureAnesthesiaHemodynamicsInternal medicineAutoregulationHeart rate
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We tested the hypothesis that 60 days of head-down bed rest (HDBR) would affect cerebrovascular autoregulation and that this change would be correlated with changes in tolerance to the upright posture. Twenty-four healthy women (32 +/- 4 yrs) participated in a 60-d bed rest study at the MEDES Clinic in Toulouse, France. End tidal CO2 (ETCO2), continuous blood pressure (BP), middle cerebral artery (MCA) velocity and time to presyncope (endpoint) were measured during an orthostatic tolerance test conducted before/after bed rest. Given the large range of change in tolerance even within assigned countermeasure groups, we separated subjects for this analysis on the basis of the change in endpoint (Delta endpoint) pre- to post-bed rest. Autoregulation and CO2 responsiveness were evaluated on a different day from a two-breath test with intermittent hypercapnic exposure. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) modeled the two confounding inputs, BP and CO2, on cerebrovascular blood flow. The cerebrovascular resistance index (CVRi) was expected to decrease following a decrease in BP at the MCA to assist in maintenance of cerebral blood flow. Subjects with the smallest Delta endpoint after bed rest had a 78% increase in the gain of the BP --> CVRi response. Meanwhile, the groups with greater decline in orthostatic tolerance post-HDBR had no change in the gain of this response. ETCO2 was lower overall following HDBR, decreasing from 41.8 +/- 3.4 to 40.2 +/- 3.0 in supine rest, 37.9 +/- 3.4 to 33.3 +/- 4.0 in early tilt, and 29.5 +/- 4.4 to 27.1 +/- 5.1 at pre-syncope. There was however, higher MCA velocity at any ETCO2 for post- compared to pre-HDBR. In summary, changes in autoregulation were found only in those subjects who had the smallest change from pre- to post-HDBR orthostatic tolerance. The changes may assist in buffering changes in cerebral blood flow during orthostatic hypotension post-HDBR. The reduction in ETCO2 after bed rest might be due to a change in chemoreceptor response to blood CO2, but the cerebrovascular system seems to have completely compensated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicSpaceflight effects on biologyFrench-language works237,207