MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2415962357 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-186-8:049

Culturing Olfactory Ensheathing Glia from the Mouse Olfactory Epithelium

2003· article· en· W2415962357 on OpenAlexaff
Edmund Au, A. Jane Roskams

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlfactory ensheathing gliaOlfactory bulbRemyelinationOlfactory mucosaBiologyNeurogenesisOlfactory systemOlfactory epitheliumNeuroscienceTransplantationPopulationRegeneration (biology)Neural stem cellSchwann cellCentral nervous systemSpinal cord injuryOlfactory nerveCell biologyAnatomyStem cellSpinal cordMedicineMyelinInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The majority of studies centered on understanding the in vitro properties of olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG) have utilized OEG prepared from the nerve fiber layer of the embryonic or neonatal olfactory bulb ( 1 – 3 ), summarized in chapter 4. In fact, a significant fraction of the OEG population is found within the lamina propria of the olfactory epithelium as they ensheath olfactory receptor axons en route to the olfactory bulb Fig. 1 ). Generating olfactory ensheathing glia from the lamina propria presents a unique set of obstaclesfreeing the lamina propria tissue from the neuronal epithelium, the cartilaginous turbinates, and the extracellular matrix (ECM) in which the cells are embedded, in a way that will avoid fibroblast contamination. Thus, the method used to culture epithelium-derived OEGs is quite different from the method for bulb-derived glia, and encompasses steps to minimize cartilage contamination (careful dissection), digest away ECM (using a defined enzyme treatment), and remove fibroblasts, which certainly will find their way into the culture (cytotoxic lysis of contaminating fibroblasts). This method generates a culture of proliferating olfactory ensheathing glia that express, thus far, the same antigenic markers as bulb-derived olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) ( 4 ). The procedure outlined in this chapter has been shown to eliminate 99% of nonglial cells from the glial culture by passage 3, and to produce a glial culture that is 98-100% positive for the glial markers (glial fibrillary acidic protein) (GFAP), S100Beta and p75, at 4 wk in vitro. Distribution of olfactory ensheathing glia. Olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG, depicted by stars) are distributed throughout the olfactory neuraxis and ensheath the olfactory nerve from the olfactory turbinates (in the peripheral nervous system, PNS), through the cribriform plate and around the olfactory bulb (in the central nervous system, CNS). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207