MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P18.05 Contribution of biomarkers to the validation of self-reported condom use in a treatment as prevention and a pre-exposure prophylaxis demonstration study among female sex workers

2015· article· en· W2416012089 on OpenAlexaff
Michel Alary, Luc Béhanzin, FA Guédou, Nassirou Geraldo, E Goma Mastétsé, N Singbo, JC Sossa, DM Zannou, Katia Giguère

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChlamydiaMcNemar's testCondomGold standard (test)GynecologyGonorrheaObstetricsInternal medicineImmunologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Syphilis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The phenomenon of condom migration remains a major concern whenever a new HIV prevention approach is being considered to strengthen the existing preventive arsenal. We are currently measuring the baseline condom use at the recruitment visit of an on-going demonstration study on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and treatment as prevention (TasP), involving female sex workers (FSWs) in Cotonou, Benin, West Africa. Methods During the recruitment visit, data on unprotected sex were collected through face-to-face interviews, from the first 112 FSWs with available biomarker results, recruited as of February 28, 2015. In addition, vaginal samples were tested for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Y chromosome DNA (Yc-DNA) PCR tests, to validate the self-reported unprotected sex. Additional biomarkers include gonorrhoea and chlamydia testing using nucleic-acid amplification tests and urine pregnancy tests. Performance parameters of the self-reported unprotected sex were calculated using combined results of all biomarkers as gold standard for recent semen exposure. Results The prevalence of recent self-reported unprotected sex with all types of sexual partners was 31.2% (35/112) vs. 51.8% (58/112) according to the combined biomarkers (p = 0.003, McNemar test). Using the combined biomarkers as gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of self-reported unprotected sex were 34.5% and 72.2%, respectively. The prevalences of gonorrhoea and chlamydia at the recruitment visit were 8.0% (9/112) and 6.2% (7/112), respectively. Either infection was present in 16 participants (14.3%), out of whom 10 were positive for PSA or Yc-DNA PCR. The pregnancy test was positive for two participants of whom one was positive for both PSA and Yc-DNA PCR. Conclusion These results confirm the questionable validity of self-reported condom use among FSWs. They underscore the need of supplementing self-reported data by biomarkers to improve data reliability. These early results are part of the baseline data that will be subsequently used to look for condom migration. Disclosure of interest statement This study is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Truvada® for pre-exposure prophylaxis is provided free of charge by Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207