MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416271665 · doi:10.4324/9780203097267.ch15

Culturally Responsive Science Education for Indigenous and Ethnic Minority Students

2015· book-chapter· en· W2416271665 on OpenAlex
Elizabeth McKinley, Mark Joo Seng Gan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousEthnic groupSociologyPedagogyPsychologyAnthropologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The second strand in this chapter focuses on a broader view of student success that encompasses the complex interaction of family, social, cultural, educational, economic, and political contexts. Led in particular by indigenous researchers, this strand contests the characterization of success evident in the fi rst strand, which mainly lies in achievement. Arguments within this view are based on the nature of knowledge and the importance of cultural identity to indigenous and ethnic minority communities. Although little or nothing has changed from the indigenous research point of view forwarded in the earlier chapter (McKinley, 2007), there is still a pervasiveness of unresolved concerns-the devaluation and destruction of people’s cultures, languages, beliefs, and values have all affected and continue to affect indigenous people’s wellbeing. For example, Richards and Scott (2009) argue that a policy of cultural genocide in Canada led to the establishment of residential schools administered by religiousIntroductionSince the writing of the last chapter in the previous handbook (McKinley, 2007), educational research continues to be concerned with indigenous and minority students’ access, participation, and achievement in science education. The underrepresentation of indigenous and some ethnic minority students in secondary science education is a major social and economic disadvantage for these communities and a major challenge for science educators in industrial countries. The reason for this is that the lack of participation and achievement by these communities is perceived as being particularly urgent as they strive for a highly skilled workforce specifi cally in science-based subjects to build their knowledge-based economies. Identifi ed as a “barrier” to this goal is that the number of students being educated in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects has fallen (Ezeife, 2003). There are two forces at work here: The numbers of students in science courses from groups who have historically participated has diminished, and the demographics of First World nations’ move toward greater proportions of indigenous and ethnic minority students. In essence, science education research is faced with questions regarding how it can increase the uptake of science-based subjects by students who have previously been excluded from participating in them and, to a large extent, participating in many of their benefi ts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndigenous and Place-Based EducationFrench-language works237,207