[Scaffolds based on collagen and chitosan for post-burn tissue engineering].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Porous scaffolds based on collagen and chitosan have been obtained from mixed bio-polymeric solutions and mixture freeze-drying method in the purpose of using them as materials for post-burns tissue regeneration. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Soluble collagen from bovine leather was obtained by acid-base extraction (isoelectric pH = 4.82). Two types of chitosan (CS I, M(w) = 755.900, de-acetylating degree of 79.2% and CS II, M(w) = 309.900, de-acetylating degree of 79.7%), were provided by Vascon Co., Canada. Various compositions were prepared and then structurally and morphologically characterized. In vitro degradation studies were performed in buffered collagenase or chitosan solutions, respectively, and the kinetic data were analysed. Materials effect on the tissue regeneration was tested on heat-induced burns in Wistar rats by covering the damaged tissue with collagen-chitosan scaffolds for a period of 28 days. Materials were changed every 7 days. At the end of the follow-up period skin tissue samples were harvested for histological investigation. RESULTS: By freeze-drying of collagen-chitosan solutions porous scaffolds were obtained with a lamellar morphology and porosity closer to chitosan than to collagen. In vitro degradation tests in simulated body fluid with collagenase revealed a decrease of the degradation rate of the collagen by mixing with chitosan. By using chitosan with lower molecular weight the degradation rate of the materials was decreased too, and the influence of the proportion of chitosan in composition diminished; stronger interactions between polymers hinder the enzyme diffusion to the following amino-acids groups: glycine - leucine (Gly-Leu), glycine - isoleucine (Gly-Ile), alanine-proline-glycine/leucine (-Ala-Pro-Gly-/-Leu-). In vivo tests and histological examination revealed a differentiated repair process of the post-combustion wounds in accordance with the scaffold-type influence. CONCLUSION: Scaffolds based on collagen and chitosan are biocompatible materials with promising results for tissue regeneration of the wounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".