Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whether the Dirac sea model is right is verifiable. Assuming the Dirac sea is a physical reality, we have one imagination that a negative energy particle(s) in the sea and a usual positive energy particle(s) will form a neutral atom. The features of the atom can be studied using the nonrelativistic reduction of the Bethe-Salpeter equation, especially for a two body system. This work is dedicated to discuss the bound state of spin-0 and spin-$\frac{\displaystyle 1}{\displaystyle 2}$ constituents. The study shows that an atom consisting of a negative energy particle $(e^-$ or $hc)$ and a positive energy particle $(u\overline{d}$ or $hc)$ has some features of a neutrino, such as spin, lepton number and oscillation. One deduction is that if the atom is a real particle, an atom $X$ consisting of two negative energy particles and a nucleus with double charges exists in nature, which can be observed in Strangeonium, Charmonium and Bottomonium decays $[s\overline{s}]$, $[c\overline{c}]$ and $[b\overline{b}]\rightarrow X \pi^-\pi^- e^+e^+~+~hc$ with $X$ invisible at KLOE, CLEOc, BESIII, Belle and BaBar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it