L’Anatman nell’insegnamento del Buddha: orizzonte nihilista o linea di dialogo interreligioso?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spiritual path that led the young Siddhartha to become the Buddha (the Enlightened One), begins from the experience of pain present in human life. From here begins for him a journey of discovery that will lead to the denial of the Atman, the central concept of Hindu spirituality, by means of which it sketches out the individual spiritual principle, very similar to what Aristotelian-Thomistic metaphysics called “soul”. This denial has led many to consider Buddhism as a predominantly atheistic system whose horizon is lost in the ocean of nothingness. The Buddhist position, however, should be reconsidered in the cultural and social context of nascent Buddhism and that of what it later became. Such an understanding will lead the A. in the present contribution to reconsider the denial of the Atman itself not as a preliminary to the denial of God, but as an introduction to an approach to transcendence different from that present in the great monotheistic religions . Such an approach can become for all seekers of the Eternal a bridge for dialogue and a place of meeting between them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".