MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2416935951 · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12616

Direct and indirect effects of native range expansion on soil microbial community structure and function

2016· article· en· W2416935951 on OpenAlex
Courtney G. Collins, Chelsea J. Carey, Emma L. Aronson, Christopher W. Kopp, Jeffrey M. Diez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland and Wildlife Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of California, Riverside
KeywordsSpecies richnessEcologyAbiotic componentEcosystemMicrobial population biologySoil biologyEcosystem engineerPlant communityBiotaEnvironmental gradientBiologyNative plantCommunity structureEnvironmental scienceIntroduced speciesSoil waterHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Analogous to the spread of non‐native species, shifts in native species’ ranges resulting from climate and land use change are also creating new combinations of species in many ecosystems. These native range shifts may be facilitated by similar mechanisms that provide advantages for non‐native species and may also have comparable impacts on the ecosystems they invade. Soil biota, in particular bacteria and fungi, are important regulators of plant community composition and below‐ground ecosystem function. Compared to non‐native plant invasions, there have been relatively few studies examining how soil biota influence – or are influenced by – native species range shifts. Here, we examined how a native range‐expanding sagebrush species ( Artemisia rothrockii ) affects below‐ground abiotic conditions and microbial community structure and function using next‐generation sequencing coupled with other biotic and abiotic soil analyses. We utilized a range‐expansion gradient , together with a shrub removal experiment and structural equation models, to determine the direct and indirect drivers of these interconnected processes. Sagebrush colonization increased bacterial and archaeal richness and diversity and altered community composition across the expansion gradient. Soil organic C and N and soil moisture increased with sagebrush presence; however, results varied across the expansion gradient. We found no relationship between sagebrush and soil pH ; however, pH strongly influenced microbial richness and diversity. Microbial (substrate‐induced) respiration was influenced by soil organic N, as well as microbial diversity and functional group relative abundances, highlighting direct and indirect effects of sagebrush on microbial community structure and function. Microbial community composition of soils after 4 years of sagebrush removal was more similar to communities in shrub interspaces than underneath shrubs, suggesting microbial community resilience. Synthesis . Our results suggest that native range expansions can have important impacts on soil biological communities, soil chemistry and hydrology which can further impact below‐ground ecosystem processes such as nutrient cycling and litter decomposition. The combination of high‐throughput sequencing and structural equation modelling used here offers an exciting yet underutilized approach to understanding how both native and non‐native species’ range expansions may affect the structure and function of soil ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it