Radiologic outcome and its relationship to functional disability in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the radiologic outcome in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) and the relationship of radiologically detected joint damage to functional disability using multivariate analyses. METHODS: Selection criteria included a diagnosis of JRA made by 1977 American College of Rheumatology criteria, onset of arthritis > or = 5 years prior to study, current age > or = 8 years, a minimum grade 3 reading ability, and the availability of radiographs. Disability was measured by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and Steinbrocker classifications. Radiographs taken within 2 years after onset (early) and the most recent radiographs (late) were examined by a single pediatric radiologist blinded to patients' identities, diagnoses, and outcomes. Multiple regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: On late radiographs the frequencies of joint space narrowing were 38, 14, 43, and 79%, respectively, among patients with systemic, pauciarticular, rheumatoid factor (RF) negative polyarticular, and RF positive polyarticular onset; erosions occurred in 63, 25, 39, and 75%, respectively. Early erosions were most frequent in patients with RF+ polyarticular onset, while both joint space narrowing and erosions occurred early in systemic onset. Radiologic signs of joint damage were most frequent at hips and wrists, while knees and ankles were relatively spared. Based on patients who had radiographs performed within one year of clinical study, 17.7% of the variation in CHAQ score was explained by joint space narrowing, 32.4% by pain, and 5% by a severe rating on physician's global estimate of disease activity. The odds of a Steinbrocker class > I were increased by joint space narrowing, pain, systemic onset, and active joint count. CONCLUSION: Differences in the frequencies and patterns of joint damage occur both among JRA onset subtypes and among individual joints. Radiographic damage, especially joint space narrowing, correlates with functional disability. However, pain is the major contributor to variation in CHAQ scores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".