Observations of Multi-Scale Granular Kinematics Around Driven Piles in Plane Strain Condition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The behavior of granular media around driven piles is not well understood. Current design guidelines still remain empirical and highly approximate. Plane-strain calibration chamber tests have been conducted to provide visual observations of the penetration mechanisms occurring during driving. Tests were performed to investigate the effects of confinement, relative density, and soil type. Digital image correlation (DIC) combined with other advanced image analysis tools were used to obtain meso-scale displacement, finite strain maps, as well as micro scale particle kinematics during pile installation. The observed shear strain map for the confined dense Ottawa sand test shows a wedge-type soil failure plane with a rigid cone of sand beneath the pile tip. The obtained volumetric strain maps show an intense compression zone directly below the pile tip, followed by a dilation zone to accommodate shear. High degree of sand compaction at the pile tip during driving also created a thin dilation strip along the pile shaft. High hoop stresses could then be sustained in the surrounding denser sand by arching. Large rotation and chaotic particle motion were also observed in the areas where there were large shear and volumetric strains. The random motion of particles near pile boundaries was further confirmed through affine/non-affine analysis of grain kinematics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".