Case 2: A three-year-old boy with photographic leukocoria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A three-year-old Caucasian boy was referred by his paediatrician with concerns of leukocoria in the left eye, which was visible in all his photographs (Figure 1). His medical history was unremarkable, and the patient was meeting all developmental milestones. Figure 1) Two photographs (A) and (B) displaying a white crescent in the inferior pupil margin of left eye. The corneal reflections from the camera flash are imaged symmetrically within the pupil of each eye with a slight nasal bias. The red background in (B) arises ... On examination, the patient’s visual acuity in the right eye was 20/30. Left eye acuity was attempted; however, unable to be assessed due to severe agitation on occlusion (of the right eye). The Hirschberg test revealed symmetrically imaged corneal reflexes within the pupils, indicating no sign of strabismus. The Bruckner reflex revealed asymmetrical reflexes with the whiter, brighter reflex in the left eye. Significant hyperopia (+6.50D) was revealed in the left eye; however, normal levels (+1.50D) were displayed in the right eye. Pupils were equal, round and reactive to light, with no relative afferent pupil defect. Both the anterior and posterior segments revealed no abnormalities including negative signs for cataract, intraretinal tumour and retinal exudates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".