[Two types of diaphragmatic plication; therapeutic plication and prophylactic plication].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plication of the hemidiaphragm is effective to relieve respiratory symptoms such as exertional dyspnea and orthopnea of the patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis. We have experiences of 2 types of diaphragmatic plication;one for the symptomatic patients with unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis, and the other for the patients who underwent phrenicotomy during extended surgery for a recurrent thymoma. The former plication was performed for a therapeutic purpose to alleviate the patient's symptoms. The latter was performed for a prophylactic purpose to keep the patient free from possible symptoms or postoperative morbidity after phrenicotomy. Case 1:A 65-year-old female with an eventration of the right diaphragm underwent a sternal resection and reconstruction for a large desmoid tumor. After continuous mechanical ventilation for 3 months, she was still under noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) for 24 hours a day. Plication of the right hemidiaphragm was performed and the patient was successfully weaned from NPPV. Case 2:A 41-year-old female with myasthenia gravis underwent a surgery for a recurrent thymoma. Left phrenicotomy was necessary to achieve a complete resection of the tumor. Plication of the left diaphragm was performed during the tumor resection to prevent possible respiratory complications. Postoperative course was uneventful, and her vital capacity was well maintained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".