Synthesis, Characterization and Preliminary Microbial Studies of 4-{[(E)–1h–Indol–3h–Lmethylidene]Amino}–1,5-Dimethyl-2-Phenyl-1,2-Dihydro-3h-Pyrazol–3-One and Its Al(Iii), In(Iii) and Tl(I) Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
4-{[(E)–1H–indol–3H–ylmethylidene]amino}–1,5-dimethyl-2-phenyl-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrazol–3-one and its Al(III), In(III) and Tl(I) Complexes have been synthesized and characterized by physical methods and spectral studies. All the complexes were purified and their structures were elucidated using melting point, stoichiometry, molar conductivity, UV-visible, infrared, nuclear magnetic resonance and GCMS Spectral Studies The geometry around the metals were deduced based on the spectral information and were found to be five coordinate in all the complexes. The Schiff base ligand is coordinated to the metals through the participation of its imine nitrogen, indole-nitrogen and the oxygen of the antipyrine moiety. These complexes were also tested against different bacteria and fungi using Agar well diffusion method to determine their antimicrobial potency and they were found sensitive against Escherichia Coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Basillus subtilis and Candida albicans but none was found active against Staphylococcus aureus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".