MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2418377062 · doi:10.1061/9780784412626.089

Probabilistic Approach to Determining Internal Pressures Based on Wind Tunnel Measurements

2012· article· en· W2418377062 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Dale, Peter Irwin, Suresh Kumar, John E. Kilpatrick, Jon Galsworthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsRowan Williams Davies & Irwin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal pressureBreakageStructural engineeringCladding (metalworking)Wind tunnelInternal frictionWind engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Internal pressure can be a significant component of the overall net pressure the cladding would experience during wind storms. These internal pressures are in the order of about 10% to sometimes even 50% of the overall pressure exerted on the cladding elements. The higher percentages are usually the result of a dominant opening on the façade. Such a dominant opening in the middle of the façade of an apartment with single face exposed to the exterior could in fact decrease the loading. In such situation, instead of assuming the dominant opening, RWDI consider nominal leakage suggested by the code as the internal pressure. For corner apartments, where orthogonal building faces have been exposed to wind, the opening in one façade could exert high internal pressure to the orthogonal façade in phase with the high external pressure acting on it. This could result in very high overall pressure. Note that the area of internal pressures die to wind has received very little attention in the past. Also, the available past research by others has very little touch to the practical application. In the past, RWDI has developed a novel methodology accounting for the above aspects of internal pressures assuming a certain probability of breakage. Although there has been an increase in the amount of research into wind borne debris and the resistance of various glazing materials to an impact, application of these results in relation to the probability of breakage and the design for wind loading needs to be investigated. The aim of this paper is to propose a link between the research considering wind borne debris damage and the approximation of internal pressures from the results of wind tunnel pressure tests. The random and chaotic nature of many of the variables involved in the cause of an opening in the building façade, and the subsequent formation of internal pressures makes a deterministic solution almost impossible to achieve. As such, the paper outlines a probabilistic approach to merge the two lines of research. The results of research presented on the subjects of damage due to wind borne debris are used as the basis for determining the probability of a dominant opening occurring on a building façade. Differences in relationships between this probability of an opening and the positive and negative internal pressure scenarios are also investigated. Internal pressures are estimated corresponding to a selected reasonable risk level, or return period, using the probability of an opening applied to the results of wind tunnel tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207