MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2418987724 · doi:10.1093/jaoac/90.3.817

Application of a Quantitative Carrier Test to Evaluate Microbicides against Mycobacteria

2007· article· en· W2418987724 on OpenAlexaff
V. Susan Springthorpe, Syed A. Sattar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of AOAC International · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMedical Device Sterilization and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVialChromatographySodium hypochloriteSerial dilutionMicrobiologyAgarBleachChemistryMedicineBiologyBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbicides for reprocessing heat-sensitive medical devices, such as flexible endoscopes, must be mycobactericidal to reduce the risk of nosocomial infections. Suspension test methods currently used for efficacy evaluation lack the stringency required for assessing inactivation of mycobacteria on surfaces. The quantitative carrier test method reported here is based on mycobacteria-contaminated reference carrier disks of brushed stainless steel. Each disk was contaminated with 10 microL of a suspension of Mycobacterium terrae containing a soil load. Each disk with a dried inoculum was placed in a glass or Teflon vial, and then overlaid with 50 microL of the test formulation or 50 microL saline for the control carriers. Five test and 3 control disks were used in each run. At the end of the contact time, each vial received 9.95 mL neutralizer solution with 0.1% Tween-80 to stop the reaction and perform the initial microbicide dilution. The inoculum was eluted by mixing on a Vortex mixer for 60 s, and the eluates and saline used to subsequently wash the vials and the funnels were membrane-filtered. Filters were placed on plates of Middlebrook 7H11 agar and incubated at 37 degrees C for at least 30 days before colonies were counted and log10 reductions were calculated in colony-forming units. Tests with a range of commercially available products, having claims against mycobacteria, or believed to be broad-spectrum microbicides, showed that the method gave reproducible results. Products used included oxidizing agents (sodium hypochlorite and an iodophore), a phenolic, a quaternary ammonium compound, and ortho-phthalaldehyde. This method represents a much more realistic evaluation than the currently used quantitative suspension test method for the evaluation of mycobactericidal formulations for registration and, when performed at different product concentrations, allows an assessment of any safety margin or risks in using the test formulation in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AOAC InternationalSame topicMedical Device Sterilization and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207