MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419200374 · doi:10.7326/acpjc-2007-147-1-014

Review: Sirolimus-eluting stents do not differ from bare-metal stents for long-term survival in CAD

2007· article· en· W2419200374 on OpenAlex
David Massel, Kumar Sridhar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueACP Journal Club · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSirolimusRestenosisBare metalStentInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TherapeuticsJuly 1, 2007Review: Sirolimus-eluting stents do not differ from bare-metal stents for long-term survival in CADDavid Massel, MD, Kumar Sridhar, MDDavid Massel, MDLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada (D.M., K.S.)Search for more papers by this author, Kumar Sridhar, MDLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada (D.M., K.S.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2007-147-1-014 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Source CitationKastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, et al. Analysis of 14 trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1030-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17296823Clinical Impact RatingsCardiology: References1 Brophy JM, Belisle P, Joseph L. Evidence for use of coronary stents. A hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:777-86. [PMID: 12755549] Google Scholar2 Sackett DL, Gent M. Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1410-2. [PMID: 514321] Google Scholar3 Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503-16. [PMID: 17387127] Google Scholar4 Cutlip DE, Chhabra AG, Baim DS, et al. Beyond restenosis: five-year clinical outcomes from second-generation coronary stent trials. Circulation. 2004;110:1226-30. [PMID: 15337693] Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada (D.M., K.S.) PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoReview: Drug-eluting stents are more effective than bare-metal stents for reducing acute MI at 6 to 12 months after implantation David Massel and Kumar Sridhar July 1, 2007Volume 147, Issue 1Page: 14KeywordsAngioplastyClinical trialsCoronary arteriesCoronary stentingDrugsHealth care quality assessmentHeartHemorrhageInformation storage and retrievalLesionsMyocardial infarctionNecrosisPercutaneous coronary interventionPopulation statisticsRevascularizationStable coronary artery diseaseStent implantationSurgeryThrombosis ePublished: 9 March 2020 Issue Published: July 1, 2007 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2007 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it