MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2419300822 · doi:10.1115/ht2007-32130

Thin Film Phonon Heat Conduction by the Dispersion Lattice Boltzmann Method

2007· article· en· W2419300822 on OpenAlexaff
Rodrigo Escobar, Cristina H. Amon, Amador M. Guzma ́n

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhononBoltzmann equationThermal conductionCondensed matter physicsThermal conductivityLattice Boltzmann methodsMean free pathMaterials scienceDebye modelPhysicsMechanicsThermodynamicsScatteringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical simulations of time-dependent thermal energy transport in semiconductor thin films are performed using the Lattice Boltzmann Method applied to phonon transport. The discrete Lattice Boltzmann Method is derived from the continuous Boltzmann transport equation assuming nonlinear, frequency-dependent phonon dispersion for acoustic and optical phonons. Results indicate that the heat conduction in silicon thin films displays a transition from diffusive to ballistic energy transport as the characteristic length of the system becomes comparable to the phonon mean free path, and that the thermal energy transport process is characterized by the propagation of multiple, superimposed phonon waves. The methodology is used to characterize the time-dependent temperature profiles inside films of decreasing thickness. Thickness-dependent thermal conductivity values are computed based on steady-state temperature distributions obtained from the numerical models. It is found that reducing feature size into the subcontinuum regime decreases the thermal conductivity when compared to bulk values, at a higher rate than what was displayed by the Debye-based gray Lattice Boltzmann Method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207