Chloral Hydrate Disposition following Single-DoseAdministration to Critically Ill Neonates and Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of chloral hydrate (CH) have been studied in healthy adults, no comprehensive studies have been done in neonates and young infants. Major physiological differences between these groups could greatly affect drug disposition. In this study the patient population (22 patients) was divided into three groups according to postconceptual age: group 1 = preterm infants (31-37 weeks), group 2 = fullterm infants (38-42 weeks) and group 3 = toddler-child patients (57-708 weeks). After receiving one 50 mg/kg oral dose of CH, the parent drug and its metabolites were determined by gas chromatography utilizing an electron capture detector. CH, contrary to what has been reported in the adult, was detectable for several hours after oral administration to patients in all three groups. A highly significant negative correlation was observed amongst the three groups for the half-life (t1/2) and area-under-the-curve for 0 to infinity values for trichloroethanol (TCE), the active metabolite responsible for the sedation effect. The t1/2 value for TCE in group 3 (9.67 h) was similar to that reported for the adult population, but in the less mature subjects it was approximately three (group 2: 27.8 h) to four times (group 1: 39.8 h) greater. Trichloroacetic acid had a remarkably long residence time in the study population after a single dose of CH. The concentration of this metabolite failed to decline even 6 days after dose. These issues should be carefully considered when CH administration is contemplated for clinical use in neonates, infants and children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".