MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2420507009 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now067.24

PNR-28PRIMARY DISSEMINATED LEPTOMENINGEAL NEUROECTODERMAL TUMORS IN CHILDREN: A CASE SERIES AND REPORT OF A LONG TERM SURVIVOR

2016· article· en· W2420507009 on OpenAlexaff
Amanda Li, Christopher Dunham, Sylvia Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Term (time)MedicinePediatricsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central nervous system primitive neuroectodermal tumours (CNS-PNETs) are a heterogeneous group of poorly differentiated neuroepithelial tumours. Disseminated leptomeningeal CNS- PNET without a clear primary lesion is extremely rare, and nearly uniformly fatal in published cases. We report a series of 5 children with primary leptomeningeal CNS-PNET, including one long-term survivor. METHODS: Clinical data was collected retrospectively, and pathology was reviewed to confirm diagnosis. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2015, five children ages 1 - 12 years (median 4 years) were confirmed to have primary leptomeningeal CNS-PNET. Three children, who were treated with surgery and chemotherapy alone, progressed and died at 1, 3, and 5 years respectively. One child diagnosed at 4 years of age was treated with craniospinal radiation of 3600cGy and multi-agent chemotherapy including etoposide, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and cisplatin. Nine years later, a persistent spinal lesion was felt to be slowly increasing in size, and was therefore treated with 3 cycles of temozolomide and etoposide. She remains alive and disease-free, 13 years from diagnosis. One child is currently still receiving therapy, but demonstrated a complete response following 5 cycles of HeadStart II regimen. CONCLUSION: We present a single-institutional series of primary leptomeningeal CNS-PNET. Generally, these children have poor outcomes; however, we describe a long-term survivor treated with craniospinal radiation and chemotherapy. The variation in outcomes of these cases suggests there may be differences in underlying biology. Further molecular subtyping may capture these differences and potentially influence treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→