MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2420522762 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14163

Fetal sex and maternal risk of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

2016· review· en· W2420522762 on OpenAlexaff
Diana Jaskolka, Ravi Retnakaran, Bernard Zinman, CK Kramer

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEclampsiaMeta-analysisMedicineObstetricsSubgroup analysisRelative riskContext (archaeology)Confidence intervalFetusPopulationPregnancyPreeclampsiaGynecologyInternal medicineBiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background A preponderance of male fetuses in pregnancies complicated by pre‐eclampsia was described over 40 years ago. Since then, however, there has been conflicting evidence in the literature, with some studies supporting a male preponderance, some demonstrating no relationship with fetal sex, and others reporting increased risk in pregnancies bearing females. Objectives In this context, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis to objectively evaluate the relationship between fetal sex and maternal risk of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia. Search strategy Studies from January 1950 to April 2015 were identified from PUBMED and EMBASE. Selection criteria This systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluated 22 articles reporting data on fetal sex and prevalence of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia. Data collection and analysis Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Pooled estimates of the relative risk (RR) were calculated by random‐effects model. Main results Male fetus was considered the exposure and prevalence of maternal pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia was the outcome of interest. We identified 534 studies through electronic searches and three studies through manual searches. Twenty‐two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, yielding data on 3 163 735 women. Pooled analyses of these studies showed no association between male fetal sex and maternal risk of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia (RR 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI 0.97–1.05); however, a subgroup analysis including only studies that evaluated the non‐Asian population (n = 2 931 771 women) demonstrated that male fetal sex was associated with increased maternal risk of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia (RR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03–1.06; I2 = 10%; P = 0.33). Conclusion Male fetal sex is associated with maternal risk of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia in the non‐Asian population. Tweetable abstract Fetal sex is associated with maternal risk of pre‐eclampsia/eclampsia in the non‐Asian population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.034
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologySame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207