Tunable Hydrogel Thin Films from Reactive Synthetic Polymers as Potential Two-Dimensional Cell Scaffolds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes the formation of cross-linked 10-200-nm-thick polymer hydrogel films by alternating the spin-coating of two mutually reactive polymers from organic solutions, followed by hydrolysis of the resulting multilayer film in aqueous buffer. Poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) (PMM) was deposited from acetonitrile solution, and poly(N-3-aminopropylmethacrylamide-co-N-2-hydroxypropylmethacrylamide) (PAPMx, where x corresponds to the 3-aminopropylmethacrylamide content ranging from 10 to 100%) was deposited from methanol. Multilayer films were formed in up to 20 deposition cycles. The films cross-linked during formation by reaction between the amine groups of PAPMx and the anhydride groups of PMM. The resulting multilayer films were covalently postfunctionalized by exposure to fluoresceinamine, decylamine, d-glucamine, or fluorescently labeled PAPMx solutions prior to the hydrolysis of residual anhydride in aqueous PBS buffer. This allowed tuning the hydrophobicity of the film to give static water contact angles ranging from about 5 to 90°. Increasing the APM content in PAPMx from 10 to 100% led to apparent Young's moduli from 300 to 700 kPa while retaining sufficient anhydride groups to allow postfunctionalization of the films. This allowed the resulting (PMM/PAPMx) multilayer films to be turned into adhesion-promoting or antifouling surfaces for C2C12 mouse myoblasts and MCF 10A premalignant human mammary epithelial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".