N2O emissions from oil palm on mineral soils: measurements and modelling challenges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In oil palm plantations, addition of nitrogen (N) via legume cover crops and fertilisers is a common practice to achieve the yield potential of the crop. It is associated with effects on climate change through emissions of N2O (Choo et al., 2011). As oil palm is the most rapidly expanding tropical perennial crop, and is expected tokeep expanding in the next decades (Corley, 2009), this raises environmental concerns. We reviewed the available measurements for N2O and other N fluxes in oil palm plantations on mineral soils (Pardon et al., under review, a). We saw that direct N2O emissions were the most uncertain N flux, ranging from 0.01-7.3 kgN.ha-1.yr-1, with a tendency to be higher during the immature phase (Ishizuka et al., 2005 ; Banabas, 2007). However, only very few measurements were available on mineral soils, and data is still lacking to better understand the potential effects of spatial heterogeneity in plantations (soil properties, soil cover) and management practices (e.g. fertiliser application timing, splitting, placement). We compared 11 existing models and 27 sub-models to simulate oil palm N budget and losses, among which 7 sub-models were specific to N 2 O emissions (Pardon et al., under review, b). We saw that direct N2O emissions estimates were some of the most variable across models, ranging from 0.8-7 kgN.ha-1.yr-1 (Mosier et al., 1998; Bouwman et al., 2002b ; IPCC 2006, from Eggleston et al., 2006 ; Crutzen et al., 2008 ; Meier et al., 2012 ; APSIM from Huth et al., 2014 ; Shcherbak et al., 2014) . Mineral fertiliser was identified as the main contributor to the emissions, but plant residues and soil N mineralisation were also important. The models accounting for felled palms decomposition, em pty fruit bunches applications, and biological N fixation also estimated a peak of N2O emissions during the immature phase. Therefore direct emissions of N2O in oil palm plantations seemed not to be negligible in terms of environmental effect (2.98 to 2,175 kgCO 2 e.ha-1.yr-1, assuming a global warming potential of 298 for N 2 O). However, in order to be able to adapt management practices to mitigate these emissions, knowledge is still lacking to better understand the variability of the emissions. And the main challenges in modelling are to model the impact of management practices, taking into account the soil N dynamics and residues decomposition, and this over the whole cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".