Gottron Papules and Gottron Sign with Ulceration: A Distinctive Cutaneous Feature in a Subset of Patients with Classic Dermatomyositis and Clinically Amyopathic Dermatomyositis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Gottron papules and Gottron sign are characteristic and possibly pathognomonic cutaneous features of classic dermatomyositis and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (DM/CADM). However, the Gottron papules/Gottron sign with cutaneous ulceration (ulcerative Gottron papules/Gottron sign) are less common. We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of patients with DM/CADM who have ulcerative Gottron papules/Gottron sign. METHODS: Clinical features, laboratory findings, and prognosis of patients with DM/CADM who had Gottron papules/Gottron sign with or without ulceration were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Occurrences of acute interstitial pneumonia/subacute interstitial pneumonia (AIP/SIP) were significantly higher in patients with ulcerative Gottron papules/Gottron sign (19/26) versus patients with Gottron papules/Gottron sign without ulceration (2/66, p < 0.001). We also observed that the white blood cell counts (mean ± SD 4.2 ± 1.6 vs 6.9 ± 2.9; p < 0.001) and creatine kinase (CK) levels (198.0 ± 377.7 vs 1364.0 ± 2477.0; p = 0.019) were significantly lower, whereas the positive rate of antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody (anti-MDA5; 88.5% vs 6.1%, p < 0.001) and serum ferritin levels (665.2 ± 433.5 vs 256.2 ± 279.0, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the patients with ulcerative Gottron papules/Gottron sign. Moreover, the cumulative survival rate of the group with ulcerative Gottron papules/Gottron sign was significantly lower (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with DM/CADM who have ulcerative Gottron papules/Gottron sign, positive anti-MDA5 antibody, and significantly lower baseline CK level are at increased risk of interstitial lung disease, especially AIP/SIP. A new designation for this subgroup of patients should be established to draw more attention to this clinical entity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".