MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2426301966 · doi:10.1109/oceansap.2016.7485635

Reviews of development and utilization of tidal energy over Chinese offshore

2016· article· en· W2426301966 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qingwei Zhou, Yang Bai, Ye Li, Xiaoyong Wang, Haifeng Wang, Min Du, Song Zhang, Jie Meng, Lei Duan, Yong Shi, Xiaoqing Cai, Yanan Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueOCEANS 2016 - Shanghai · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoastal and Marine Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTidal powerRenewable energyChinaMarine energyNameplate capacitySubmarine pipelineWork (physics)Environmental scienceOffshore wind powerGovernment (linguistics)Electricity generationMeteorologyPower (physics)GeographyEngineeringWind powerOceanographyGeologyMarine engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China has carried out five massive investigation and selection work on tidal energy and the latest survey results show that China's theoretical potentiality of the tidal energy within 10m depth contour offshore is estimated to be 192.86 GW. 171 potetial sites that have over 500 kW installed capacity add up to 22.83GW in total, with an annual energy output of 62.6 TWh. These potential sites of large scale for tidal power plant have developed in seventeen places in coastal areas in Zhejiang and Fujian provinces, each of which has the installed capacity of over ten thousand kW and enjoys fantastic natural conditions. With the support from special funds for Marine Renewable Energy, and local government and enterprises, Rushankou, Jiantiao, Bachimen, Maluanwan, and Oufei, five tidal power plants with installed capacity of over ten thousand kW, have already got complete pre-scientific research design, making it possible for further development and exploitation. While special funds also aided standardized work for development and exploitation of tidal power, it lays sound foundation for the development of the industry. Since 1950s, China has established numerous small-sized tidal power stations and built Jiangxia tidal power station, the third largest one in the world in 1986. After years of experience, the construction, maintenance and management of the tidal power station in China are relatively mature, yet still lower in development and utilization rate compared with other major maritime countries such United Kingdom, France, Canada, South Korea, and Russia. Based on the current situation of the tidal energy in China, following suggestions are proposed: abiding by the principle of sustainable development, economic utilization, scientific and technological orientation, moderate advance, and international cooperation, we will improve the specification of China's laws and regulations of marine renewable energy, while establishing unified, efficient and coordinated legal system for marine energy development and utilization. We will formulate a long-term and comprehensive overall plan for marine energy development and utilization on the basis of giving priority to functional zoning while balancing the administrative division. We will set up a leading body for the management of the overall national marine energy development projects, and define its position, duties and powers. We will draw up preferential policies to promote the marine energy development, further increase financial support and establish both normal mechanism featuring ever-increasing financial special funds and market competition mechanism. On the other hand, we will draw strength from foreign experience and use policy tools such as tax, subsidies, renewable energy trust fund, renewable energy quota obligations, and green pricing. We will construct as soon as possible the tidal energy standards for resource exploration, appraisal procedure, conversion equipment, power plant construction, and maintenance management. We will develop plans and comprehensive management system, strengthen policy and financial support, make full preparation in upper design before development and exploration, and make full preparation in assessment of "environment assessment of marine engineering" and "marine usage demonstration" while paying attention to ecological protection and coordinated development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOCEANS 2016 - ShanghaiSame topicCoastal and Marine ManagementFrench-language works237,207