Distribution of protein nitrotyrosine in synovial tissues of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Because nitric oxide related species have been found in the inflamed joints of patients with arthritis, we investigated whether protein nitrotyrosine (a marker of tissue exposure to peroxynitrite) is present in their synovial tissues. METHODS: Protein nitrotyrosine was detected immunohistochemically and by Western blot analysis. Synovial tissues removed surgically from 12 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (mean age 63.7 yrs) and 20 with osteoarthritis (OA) (mean age 66.6 yrs) were studied. RESULTS: Nitrated proteins were detected immunohistochemically in all of 18 tissues examined. Diffuse staining of the stroma was seen in all patients, with more extensive staining in RA than OA (p = 0.008). Intense staining was detected in some lymphocytes, but not in others, even within a single lymphoid aggregate. Neutrophils did not stain for nitrotyrosine. Vascular endothelial cells stained for nitrotyrosine but adjoining smooth muscle cells did not. Both cytoplasmic and nuclear staining was seen in macrophages, endothelial cells, and lymphocytes. Numerous bands of nitrated proteins were detected by Western blot analysis of 15 synovial tissue extracts. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was detected immunohistochemically in endothelial cells, macrophages, vascular smooth muscle cells, and synoviocytes. CONCLUSION: Nitrotyrosine-containing proteins were found in essentially all synovia from RA and OA patients. The most prominent site of nitration in all cases was the stroma. iNOS, the likely source of the nitrating species, was found in a variety of cell types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".