MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2428174665 · doi:10.5006/c2016-07783

The Development of Sulfur/Corrosion Inhibitor Product for Extremely Sour Environments

2016· article· en· W2428174665 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haitao Fang, Tracey Jackson, David Orta, Saadedine Tebbal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Gas Emission Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSour gasSulfurCorrosionCorrosion inhibitorMetallurgyMaterials scienceWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There are aggressive wells in Canada, Germany, and the Middle East that have high temperature, high H2S and CO2 content, and which produce several tons of elemental sulfur each day. These wells must be produced with co-injection of sulfur solvents to prevent the plugging of the well bore. As one might expect these wells can also be highly corrosive and chemical products must also include corrosion inhibitors to extend the lifespan of the wells. Qualification of sulfur solvents with corrosion resistant properties is the key to mitigating the risk of these assets. The qualification process can be challenging since laboratory testing under so harsh conditions requires addition of liquid H2S and liquid CO2 to the autoclaves at room temperature. This process requires equation-of-state calculations to model the contents of the autoclave at room temperature to achieve at-temperature conditions. This paper addresses one such qualification where the field conditions were predicted to be extremely sour with 35% of H2S, 9.5% of CO2, and a total pressure of 3400 psi at bottom hole. Temperatures were expected to exceed 300°F. The wells are also expected to produce significant amounts of elemental sulfur (>100 lb/MMScf). A combination sulfur solvent with corrosion inhibitor product was developed specifically for this sour gas field. The sulfur uptake, boiling point, emulsion tendency and the corrosion inhibition performance of the new product were evaluated in the laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndustrial Gas Emission ControlFrench-language works237,207