MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2428501400 · doi:10.2118/181744-pa

Poroelasticity During Fluid Injection in Confined Geological Reservoirs: Incorporating Effects of Seal-Rock Stiffness

2016· article· en· W2428501400 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Atefi Monfared, L. Rothenburg

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsPoromechanicsGeologySeal (emblem)StiffnessGeotechnical engineeringInjection wellDisplacement (psychology)Stress (linguistics)Elastic modulusMechanicsPetroleum engineeringPorosityMaterials sciencePorous mediumStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary This paper presents a new poroelastic solution to describe the time-dependent response of a confined geological reservoir to fluid injection through a fully penetrating vertical well treated as a point source. Unlike previous studies, vertical-confinement effects of seal rocks are incorporated in the solution. To facilitate analytical description of a fully coupled poroelastic behavior within the reservoir, the stiffness of surrounding rocks is described by the Winkler model, simplifying the response of seal rocks in the direction perpendicular to the reservoir plane. Analytical expressions are obtained for axisymmetric stress and strain components in the reservoir and for the vertical reaction stress. The latter is essential for evaluation of integrity of seal rocks during injection. Solutions are also obtained for the magnitude and location of the maximum-induced radial displacement as a function of time during injection. The effects of poroelastic coupling are articulated through the equivalent diffusion constant of the reservoir-seal rocks system. The latter is expressed through traditional poroelastic parameters as well as the relative stiffness of reservoir and seal rocks. The Winkler modulus of seal rocks, which is involved in all analytical relationships presented in this paper, is empirically linked to elastic characteristics of surrounding strata by comparing their response with the same pressure change in the reservoir according to the ideally elastic and Winkler models. The derived solutions are compared with previous studies, and verified against fully coupled numerical simulations. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess the effects of the stiffness of the confining strata on the response of a uniform reservoir to injection. The vertical component of stress and the radial and vertical displacements are found to be substantially sensitive to the magnitude of the vertical restraint. The findings note the significance of incorporating seal-rock characteristics to attain a realistic assessment of the geomechanics of injection, specifically in formations with lower elastic moduli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE JournalSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207