MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W242985923 · doi:10.26443/mjm.v6i1.417

The Placebo Standard in Regulatory Market Approval: Why the Declaration of Helsinki Has Been Ignored for 35 years

2020· article· en· W242985923 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Patrick J. Villeneuve

Bibliographic record

VenueMcGill Journal of Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboDeclarationDeclaration of HelsinkiHelsinki declarationLawAlternative medicineInformed consentPolitical sciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N/A

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.407
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.613
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4070.613
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.044
Scholarly communication0.0170.020
Open science0.0080.008
Research integrity0.0910.101
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMcGill Journal of MedicineSame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207