MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2430457253 · doi:10.6326/ndj.2014.29(5).6

全球隱密監控與國家間反應:以「梯陣」、「稜鏡」間諜網絡為例

2014· article· zh· W2430457253 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
吳胤瓛

Bibliographic record

Venue國防雜誌 · 2014
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and Social Network Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational securityPolitical scienceComputer securityAdversaryOrder (exchange)CyberwarfareConfidentialityPrismLawBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to discuss the issue of spy network with focus on global covert surveillance, and to examine the secret security agreement dominated by the United States to conduct global surveillance. The agreement was signed by the United States (NSA), United Kingdom (GCHQ), Canada (CSEC/CSE), Australia (ASD), and New Zealand (GCSB), also known as the "five eyes". They form the so called "Echelon" intelligence gathering channel which includes: "Prism", "Mainway", "Marina", "Nucleon", accompanied by the British "Tempora" plan and spy networks. In addition to criticize the controversial behavior of using spy monitor satellites to intercept electronic transmission and communications, this article is more interested in EU and other countries in the world to examine the international interaction on this issue. It has found that the core of global security strategy is always focused on national interests. Accordingly, the hegemonic states will continue to monopoly the spy network. We must be committed to maintain the confidentiality of electronic information in order to prevent various kinds of cyber invasions from China. Therefore, the information security industry needs to be included in the national defense strategy and the C^4ISK systems needs to be integrated in order to beef up the capabilities to counter enemy's cyber attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue國防雜誌Same topicInternet of Things and Social Network InteractionsFrench-language works237,207