MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2431002471

[Association of diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities with executive dysfunction in patients with leukoaraiosis].

2015· article· en· W2431002471 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Junliang Yuan, Shuangkun Wang, Xiaojuan Guo, Hua Gu, Lei Yang, Shujuan Li, Wenli Hu

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite matterLeukoaraiosisFractional anisotropyMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDiffusion MRIExecutive dysfunctionMedicineStroop effectNeuropsychologyTrail Making TestPsychologyCardiologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineCognitionPsychiatryCognitive impairmentRadiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To explore abnormal microstructural changes of white matter using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in patients with leukoaraiosis (LA), and to determine the association of such abnormalities of DTI parameters with cognitive function, especially executive function. METHODS: A total of 44 patients with LA and 36 healthy controls were recruited from the department of Neurology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University between July 2010 and June 2011. The two groups were matched for age, sex, education, and vascular risk factors. All the subjects underwent the scans of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), DTI and neuropsychological assessment. The values of mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured within white matter lesions (WML) and normal appearing white matter (NAWM). Three regions of interest (ROIs) were located in the white matter of centrum semiovale, anterior periventricular white matter and posterior periventricular white matter. The relationships between the cognitive function and the abnormalities of DTI parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: (1) Patients with LA performed significantly worse cognitive function, especially in the fields of executive function. The results of our study showed that patients with LA were associated with comprehensive cognitive function deficits, including mini mental state examination (MMSE) (24.4 ± 3.2 vs 28.3 ± 1.2), montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) (21.2 ± 3.4 vs 25.7 ± 1.7), Stroop B (69.2 ± 13.5 vs 43.3 ± 5.0), Stroop C (141.2 ± 42.6 vs 64. 8 ± 10.0), Stroop (C-B) (72.0 ± 41.9 vs 21.5 ± 9.4), trail making test (TMT)-A (73.4 ± 15.4 vs 31.1 ± 7.1), TMT-B (126.2 ± 17.5 vs 81.4 ± 5.7), digit symbol test (25.2 ± 5 .4 vs 36.7 ± 5.1) (all P<0.05). (2) The values of FA were lower, and MD were higher in WML than NAWM and controls in all the three ROIs (P<0.05). The values of FA in NAWM located in centrum semiovale and posterior periventricular white matter were lower than controls (P<0.05). The values of MD in NAWM located in anterior periventricular white matter were higher than controls (P<0.05). (3) The values of FA of NAWM located in anterior periventricular correlated inversely with the Z scores of executive function (r=-0.311, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LA are related with significant cognitive impairment, especially in the domains of executive dysfunction. Microstructural integrity of both white matter lesions and NAWM is associated with executive function. The underlying executive dysfunction in LA may attribute to the damage of the prefrontal-subcortical circle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207