Non‐local‐based spatially constrained hierarchical fuzzy <i>C</i> ‐means method for brain magnetic resonance imaging segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Owing to the existence of noise and intensity inhomogeneity in brain magnetic resonance (MR) images, the existing segmentation algorithms are hard to find satisfied results. In this study, the authors propose an improved fuzzy C ‐mean clustering method (FCM) to obtain more accurate results. First, the authors modify the traditional regularisation smoothing term by using the non‐local information to reduce the effect of the noise. Second, inspired by the mechanism of the Gaussian mixture model, the distance function of FCM is defined by using the form of certain exponential function consisting of not only the distance but also the covariance and the prior probability to improve the robustness. Meanwhile, the bias field is modelled by using orthogonal basis functions to reduce the effect of intensity inhomogeneity. Finally, they use the hierarchical strategy to construct a more flexibility function, which considers the improved distance function itself as a sub‐FCM, to make the method more robust and accurate. Compared with the state‐of‐the‐art methods, experiment results based on synthetic and real MR images demonstrate its accuracy and robustness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it