Initial Investigation of Factors Influencing Radiation Dose to Patients Undergoing Barium-Based Fluoroscopy Procedures in Tanzania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the nature and causes of radiation dose imparted to patients undergoing barium-based X-ray fluoroscopy procedures in Tanzania and to compare these doses to those reported in the literature from other regions worldwide. The air kerma area product (KAP) to patient undergoing barium investigations of gastrointestinal tract system was obtained from four consultant hospitals. The KAP was determined using a flat transparent transmission ionization chamber. Mean values of KAP for barium swallow (BS), barium meal (BM) and barium enema (BE) were 2.79, 2.62 and 15.04 Gy cm2, respectively. The mean values of KAP per hospital for the BS, BM and BE procedures varied by factors of up to 7.3, 1.6 and 2.0, respectively. The overall difference between individual patient doses across the four consultant hospitals investigated differed by factors of up to 53, 29.5 and 12 for the BS, BM and BE procedures, respectively. The majority of the mean values of KAP was lower than the reported values for Ghana, Greece, Spain and the UK, while slightly higher than those reported for India. The observed wide variation of KAP values for the same fluoroscopy procedure within and among the hospitals was largely attributed to the dynamic nature of the procedures, the patient characteristics, the skills and experience of personnel, and the different examination protocols employed among hospitals. The observed great variations of procedural protocols and patient doses within and across the hospitals call for the need to standardize examination protocols and optimize barium-based fluoroscopy procedures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".