MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W243260805

On Canadian Painting and Cinema

2005· article· en· W243260805 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Stan Brakhage

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaintingMovie theaterWhite (mutation)Art historyShadow (psychology)ArtHistoryVisual artsMedia studiesLiteratureSociologyPsychoanalysisPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor's Note: In March 1988 the Saskatchewan Film Pool brought Brakhage and Bruce Elder Regina for screenings and discussions of their and other avant-garde filmmakers' films. The event was organized by Richard Kerr. Brakhage presented his lecture, illustrated with slides and films, on 12 March 1988. In the transcript of the lecture presented here, a few digressions and exchanges with audience members have been deleted (indicated by ellipsis marks) in order maintain the lecture's focus on Brakhage's observations on Canadian painters and filmmakers. At the same time, the occasional verbal slips, incomplete sentences, ambiguous references, and the like have been retained in an effort reproduce on the printed page (as far as it is possible do so) the voice of the speaker. A complete transcript of the lecture is on file at the Mel Hoppenheim School of Cinema, Concordia University, Montreal. My thanks Brett Kashmere at Concordia for providing a copy-edited version of the transcript, and Marilyn Brakhage for granting permission publish it here. When I was a child and I first heard the term to bring Newcastle, I was very puzzled by it because as a child I didn't know Newcastle. I didn't know it was the coal centre of England. AH I knew were the words and so I had this picture of a prince bringing a lump of coal a new castle, which was very white up on the hill with spirals and so on, fluffy cloud bits here and there in it, bringing this piece of coal up this shiny new fairytale book castle. It was a compelling image, so I was persuaded. I recognized by the way adults were using the phrase that they knew it was something you weren't supposed do. But very early I began question things that adults automatically said you weren't supposed do, and I thought it was a compelling image. Later I learned more about Newcastle and coals Newcastle, that it would be absurd be bringing coal into the coal centre of England. I had rethink my attitude, but essentially I came back an even more strengthening favouring of this interpretation, because then I had been fortified by my childhood emotions. (I'm telling you, by the way, a lot about how I work and live as I spin off this yarn.) I knew by then that people grow so habitual in their attitudes towards something that they are like fish in water. As Newcastle people must be with coal. I thought that there would be nothing more wonderful than someone who would bring incredible complexity and crystalline wonder of a hardened black (but multi-shaded black) and sudden glistening piece of coal Newcastle people, and show them in all senses the wonder of something that they were producing for the world. So that's my only excuse, by way of apology, as you do have this Stan Brakhage presents Canadian Film Art which otherwise is utterly presumptuous. Ordinarily, people born and raised in Canada have told me that they have the Group of Seven presented them so continually and constantly, in such an assumption of Canadian culture in public schools, that by the time they are in the sixth grade they are entirely sick of them. The public schools have reproductions (and I have not been in any of them so I don't know what the quality of reproductions they are) and no doubt they have the problems of all reproductions of paintings. These are presented so steadily the Canadian populace that they have become bored. The problem of hanging a picture on a wall, particularly in a public institute, is that very quickly it disappears there. Your first day of school, something the left of the clock that's a glorious sunset of a reproduction of a Canadian landscape painting, might be very intriguing a child, but by the sixth grade the clock has totally triumphed over it for many years. These pictures do tend disappear into the walls where they are, unless people absolutely lie themselves that they are blinded by some of them. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207