MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2432682623 · doi:10.14740/jh269w

Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis Among Egyptian Elderly Healthy Adults

2016· article· en· W2432682623 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamad Ayed Rashwan, Doaa Abdallah Aladle, Mohamad Ali Awad, Emad El din Hassan Azmy, Amany H. Mansour, Nermeen A. Niazy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLymphocytosisMedicineMonoclonalImmunologyPathologyMonoclonal antibodyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a benign expansion of clonal B lymphocytes that can be found in the blood of healthy adults, and it has the potential for evolution to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). MBL is commonly found among elderly population. We aimed to study the frequency among 200 healthy elderly adults who were chosen from general practice, ophthalmology, gynecology, cardiology, dermatology, and orthopedic preoperative patients. The selected individuals had normal hematologic parameters with no evident history of malignant disease. Methods: Blood samples were collected on EDTA, the leukocytes were stained by CD5/CD19 and kappa/lambda/CD19, and then MBL cells were searched for using flow cytometry to detect CD19-positive B-cell population with abnormal kappa/lambda immunoglobulin light chain ratio (> 3 or < 0.3) or disease-specific immunophenotype (IPT), i.e., co-expression of CD5/CD19. Results: The frequency of MBL among the studied samples was 5.5% without significant difference between males and females. The detected frequency found may be related to the sensitivity of the method used. Higher frequencies may be detected if more colors were used to detect more antigens. Conclusion: The study suggested that MBL can be identified through routine hospital investigations among elderly subjects and that monoclonal proliferation of B lymphocytes can be detected in an increasing number depending on the progressive improvements in the flow cytometric techniques. J Hematol. 2016;5(2):54-59 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jh269w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207