Conceptual Approach in Multi-Objective Optimization of Packed Bed Membrane Reactor for Ethylene Epoxidation Using Real-coded Non-Dominating Sorting Genetic Algorithm NSGA-II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An isothermal plug flow reactor model with extended Fick diffusion model for transport through the porous membrane is utilized for simulation of ethylene oxide formation in a packed bed membrane reactor (PBMR). The model was verified and validated using published experimental data from an existing lab-scale unit. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine robustness of the model. A conceptual approach on operation and design stage multi-objective optimization study is discussed. Real-coded NSGA-II is used and effect of its parameters on optimization of reactor performance is also studied. The results of three two-objective operation-stage (with 4 decision variables) and one two-objective design-stage (with 6 decision variables) optimization case studies are presented. Good convergence to a Pareto optimal solution is achieved for all cases. Significant improvement over current experimental operation is observed in terms of increase in conversion of ethylene, selectivity to ethylene oxide and ethylene oxide product flow rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".