Review: Does the Elephant Dance? <i>Contemporary Indian Foreign Policy</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DOES THE ELEPHANT DANCE? Contemporary Indian Foreign Policy David M. Malone Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 448PP, /25.00 (cloth) ISBN: 978-0-19-955202-3The growing focus on India's role in global politics is usually interpreted as a further confirmation of dramatic transformations in study and practice of international relations. Soon after end of Cold War, commentators began pondering how far western ideas would spread in an environment characterised by the end of history. Two decades later, debate seems to be how far Asian ideas will spread. India's growing prominence in global life is one of major reasons for this shift in perspective. In particular, interest in discourses and practices of Indian foreign policymaking has grown markedly. Yet despite this newfound attention, India's external outlook remains a topic of profound ambivalence and uncertainty among scholars, policymakers, and citizens.It is important but difficult to distinguish between phantoms and substance in cacophony of voices claiming insight into way New Delhi makes foreign policy. David M. Malone's book does just this and does it brilliantly. It not only offers an erudite and much-needed reconsideration of country's international interactions, but also provides detailed and comprehensive coverage of current and likely future trajectories of Indian external relations. Malone is perfect person for this job. The book draws on experience he gained in his extensive diplomatic career, including stints as Canada's permanent representative at UN and, subsequently, as Canadian high commissioner to India. Malone has simultaneously been an active public intellectual and prolific commentator on some of key issues animating dynamics of global politics in last two decades.Because complexity of Indian foreign policy stumps most authors, Malone's insights are all more valuable. By contrast with other countries, India's external outlook is not merely property of government or ubiquitous Indian foreign service. Many other actors - including academics, journalists, and politicians of all stripes, as well as defence establishment and private companies - playa part in country's international interactions. As Malone indicates, lack of a clear division of labour among these different participants underpins that perennial chestnut of Indian foreign policy, country's lack of clear strategic and other conceptual frameworks (18).In order to trace origins of this state of affairs, Malone gives a detailed historical account of India's rich foreign policy traditions. Unlike most other observers, who look no further back than country's independence from British rule, Malone takes long view, beginning 4000 years ago with ancient Indus and Harappan civilizations, in order to establish evolution and contours of Indian international identity. However, this contextualization does not imply a straight line between past and present. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".