MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2433589348 · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000000923

Corneal Cross-Linking in Pediatric Patients With Progressive Keratoconus

2016· article· en· W2433589348 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCornea · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKeratometerKeratoconusMedicineOphthalmologyVisual acuityCorneal pachymetryCornea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To evaluate corneal cross-linking (CXL) in the treatment of keratoconus in pediatric patients. Specifically, this study investigates the impact of CXL on uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA), manifest refraction, keratometry (K) measurements, and higher order aberrations. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational case series of patients 18 years old or younger with progressive keratoconus who underwent CXL from January 2009 to August 2013. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative data including BDVA, manifest refraction, mean K readings, and corneal aberration measurements were extracted from clinical charts and topographical imaging. Visual acuity was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scale, and mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) was calculated from manifest refraction. RESULTS: The group consisted of 39 eyes from 28 patients, including 21 males and 7 females (mean age = 16.3 years, range: 11-18, standard deviation [SD] = 1.81). UDVA did not change significantly (preoperative UDVA = 1.20 logMAR, SD = 0.57, and postoperative UDVA = 0.90 logMAR, SD = 0.67, P = 0.19). BDVA did not change significantly (preoperative BDVA = 0.34 logMAR, SD = 0.27, and postoperative BDVA = 0.34 logMAR, SD = 0.23, P = 0.50). There was no significant change in mean K (preoperative K = 48.49, SD = 5.44, and postoperative K = 48.25, SD = 4.74, P = 0.34). Mean MRSE did not change significantly (preoperative MRSE = -3.29 D, SD = 4.04, and postoperative MRSE = -3.53 D, SD = 4.07, P = 0.31). Corneal aberration measurements were available for 10 eyes, and stability of measurements was demonstrated. There were no complications noted. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CXL is a safe and effective procedure that halts the progression of keratoconus in pediatric patients at 1-year follow-up. To validate these findings, longer follow-up is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it