MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2434150215 · doi:10.1111/jvs.12416

Species composition determines resistance to drought in dry forests of the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence forest region of central Ontario

2016· article· en· W2434150215 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Corinne Arthur, Jeffery P. Dech

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vegetation Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsNipissing University
FundersNipissing UniversityOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
KeywordsSpecies richnessAbundance (ecology)EcologyBasal areaResistance (ecology)EcosystemTemperate rainforestForest ecologyProductivityClimate changeDisturbance (geology)Plant communityBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Question Predicted changes in the frequency of short‐term drought events raise concerns about potential effects of climate change on forest ecosystems. Few experiments have investigated the effects of tree species richness and composition in forest assemblages exposed to drought, and general conclusions for these systems are currently lacking. We tested the hypothesis that different species richness and composition affects community‐level stability during a severe short‐term drought event across a gradient of tree species assemblages typical of temperate forest ecosystems on dry substrates. Location Great Lakes – St. Lawrence forest region, central Ontario, Canada. Methods The study assemblages spanned a gradient of 15 different combinations of species richness and composition of four tree species. The drought occurred in 2005 and was characterized by high growing season temperature and low precipitation. Plots ( n = 63) representing replicate assemblages were selected to collect increment cores ( n = 1193) and examine growth responses to past drought at the community and population levels. Cross‐dated tree ring measurements were used to reconstruct basal area increment ( BAI ) and calculate indices of resistance, resilience and productivity over the drought period. We used hierarchical analysis of variance models to estimate the effects of species richness and composition on drought responses. Results We identified a significant effect of species composition on community‐level resistance and productivity. White pine ( Pinus strobus ) abundance was associated with lower community resistance and white birch ( Betula papyrifera ) abundance with higher resistance. Assemblages with greater productivity were often characterized by the high abundance of trembling aspen ( Populus tremuloides ). There was no overall effect of the assemblage gradient on the population‐level stability; however, red pine ( Pinus resinosa ) productivity was higher in combination with trembling aspen and white birch. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that species richness had no effect on the community‐level stability of growth during a drought in temperate forests on dry substrates. Instead, there were important compositional effects that determine some aspects of stability during drought events. If pine forests were managed to maintain a component of deciduous species, the capacity to dampen the community‐level effects of more frequent drought would increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vegetation ScienceSame topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207