MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TP53 Mutation or Deletion and Efficacy with Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) (CC-5013-CLL-009 Study)

2013· article· en· W2434582744 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Bühler, Clemens‐Martin Wendtner, Michael Hallek, Thomas J. Kipps, Laura Z. Rassenti, Graeme Fraser, Anne‐Sophie Michallet, Peter Hillmen, Jan Duerig, Stephanie A. Gregory, Matt Kalaycio, Thérèse Aurran‐Schleinitz, Livio Trentin, Brendan Purse, Jennie Zhang, Jay Mei, Stephan Stilgenbauer

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLenalidomideMedicineInternal medicineNeutropeniaBendamustineChronic lymphocytic leukemiaOncologyGastroenterologyRefractory (planetary science)Febrile neutropeniaChemotherapyLeukemiaMultiple myelomaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Relapsed and refractory (rel/ref) CLL patients have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. The oral immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide has shown single-agent activity in untreated and rel/ref CLL patients, including patients with TP53 deleted/mutated CLL, which is associated with poor outcomes in response to chemotherapy. Lenalidomide targets the microenvironment to restore functional immunity to drive the elimination of leukemic cells. Here we report the efficacy of lenalidomide monotherapy in high-risk rel/ref CLL patients. Methods This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, adaptive-design study evaluated the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in rel/ref CLL. Patients had active disease per iwCLL guidelines and received ≥1 prior line of therapy, including purine-analogs or bendamustine. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive oral lenalidomide at a starting dose of 5, 10, or 15 mg daily at their initial 28-day cycle, followed by intra-patient dose escalation in 5-mg increments every 28 days, up to 25 mg/day as tolerated. Samples to determine genetic status were collected at entry and analyzed centrally at Ulm University. Results A total of 104 patients were enrolled; 103 patients were dosed and median age was 64.0 (32-81). Del(17p) and TP53 mutation were found in 23/93 (25%) and 36/96 (38%) patients, respectively; 20 patients with TP53 mutation did not have del(17p). Del(17p) patients were more likely to have TP53 mutation (77% vs. 26%), age >65 years (64% vs. 43%), high risk/Binet C (64% vs. 33%), and platelet count <150,000/mm3 (77% vs. 50%); del(17p) patients were less likely to have del(11q) (14% vs. 36%). TP53 mutation was significantly associated with del(17p) (47% vs. 8%), age >65 years (67% vs. 38%), high risk/Binet C (53% vs. 33%), and platelet count <150,000/mm3(75% vs. 45%). The median number of treatment cycles was 6.6 vs. 11.1 for patients with and without del(17p), and 8.7 vs. 10.2 for patients with and without TP53 mutations. At a median follow-up of 47.6 weeks, the overall response rate (ORR) was 44% for all patients. There was a trend toward significance for ORR in patients with vs. without del(17p) (22% vs. 46%; p = 0.051). The ORR was 36% vs. 42% for patients with and without TP53 mutation (p = 0.669). A multivariate analysis for overall response in all evaluable patients was completed on the baseline characteristics of del(11q), del(17p), TP53 mutation, unmutated IGHV, high-risk disease (Binet C or Rai high-risk), B2M (≤4 vs. >4 mg/dL), age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), number of prior treatments (<3 vs. ≥3), bulky disease, and refractory to purine-analogues in a previous regimen. None of the baseline characteristics showed statistically significant impact on response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45.1 weeks (95% CI 24.1-89.3) in all patients, 21.4 weeks (95% CI 12.4-117.6) in patients with del(17p), and 66.3 weeks (95% CI 31.4-98.4) in patients without del(17p) (p = 0.157). Median PFS in patients with and without TP53 mutation was 47.6 weeks (95% CI 20.6-117.6) vs. 41.1 weeks (95% CI 21.4-85.1) (p = 0.584). Median overall survival (OS) was 151.6 weeks (95% CI 90.3-not reached [NR])in the overall population, 80.9 weeks (95% CI 66.6-NR) in patients with del(17p), and 151.6 weeks (95% CI 90.7-NR) in patients without del(17p) (p = 0.464). Median OS in patients with and without TP53 mutation was 90.3 weeks (95% CI 68.1-NR) vs. 151.6 (95% CI 92.1-NR) (p = 0. 274). A multivariate analysis for PFS and OS was performed, including number of prior treatments. Median PFS was 89.3 weeks (95% CI 31.4-117.6) for patients with <3 prior therapies, and 31.9 weeks (95% CI 20.6-77.6) for patients with ≥3 prior therapies (p = 0.116). OS was NR for patients with <3 prior therapies, and 92.1 weeks (95% CI 68.1-151.6) for patients with ≥3 prior therapies (p = 0.012). No other variable showed statistically significant impact on PFS or OS. Conclusion Single-agent lenalidomide treatment led to similar responses, PFS, and OS in rel/ref CLL patients with or without TP53 mutations, indicating that lenalidomide activity in rel/ref CLL patients is not affected by loss of functional TP53. Despite differences in baseline characteristics (more high-risk features in the TP53-mutated subgroup), outcomes with lenalidomide treatment were comparable, and the ORR of 44% is a promising result for this heavily pretreated rel/ref CLL population with poor prognosis. Disclosures: Wendtner: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hallek:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kipps:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hillmen:Celgene: Honoraria. Purse:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stilgenbauer:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207