MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2435474768 · doi:10.2138/am-2015-5117

Pieczkaite, ideally Mn <sub>5</sub> (PO <sub>4</sub> ) <sub>3</sub> Cl, a new apatite-supergroup mineral from Cross Lake, Manitoba, Canada: Description and crystal structure

2015· article· en· W2435474768 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kimberly Tait, Neil A. Ball, F. C. Hawthorne

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsApatiteElectron microprobeTriclinic crystal systemMohs scale of mineral hardnessCrystallographyMineralogySupergroupQuartzGeologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Crystal structureMaterials scienceChemistryGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pieczkaite, ideally Mn 5 (PO 4 ) 3 Cl, is a new apatite-supergroup mineral from Cross Lake, Manitoba, Canada. It occurs as small patches and narrow veins in large crystals of apatite and (Mn,Cl)-bearing apatite in phosphate pods in the quartz core of a granitic pegmatite. Veins of Mn-bearing apatite narrow to ~25 μm where the Mn content becomes high enough to constitute pieczkaite. It is gray with a grayish-white streak, does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light, and has no observable cleavage or parting. Mohs hardness is 4-5, and pieczkaite is brittle with an irregular fracture. The calculated density is 3.783 g/cm 3 . Optical properties were measured using a Bloss spindle stage at a wavelength of 590 nm (using a gel filter). Pieczkaite is uniaxial (-) with indices of refraction ω = 1.696, ε = 1.692, both ±0.002. Pieczkaite is hexagonal, space group P6 3 /m, a = 9.504(4), c = 6.347(3) Å, V = 496.5(1) Å 3 , Z = 2, c:a = 1:0.6678. The six strongest lines in the X‑ray powder diffraction pattern are as follows: d (Å), I, (hkl): 2.794, 100, (2̅31, 1̅31); 2.744, 88, (030); 2.639, 34, (1̅22); 2.514, 25, (031, 022); 1.853, 25, (3̅42, 1̅42); 3.174, 24, (002). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave P 2 O 5 37.52, MnO 41.77, FeO 2.45, CaO 13.78, Cl 3.86, H 2 O 0.60, O≡Cl -0.87, sum 99.11 wt% where the H 2 O content was calculated as 1 - Cl apfu. The resulting empirical formula on the basis of 12 O anions is (Mn 3.36 Fe 0.20 Ca 1.40 ) Σ4.96 (P 1.01 O 4 ) 3 (Cl 0.62 OH 0.38 ) 1.00 , and the end-member formula is Mn 5 (PO 4 ) 3 Cl. The crystal structure of pieczkaite was refined to an R 1 index of 4.07% based on 308 observed reflections collected on a three-circle rotating-anode diffractometer with MoKα X-radiation. Pieczkaite is isostructural with apatite, Mn is the dominant cation at both the [9]- and [7]-coordinated-cation sites in the structure, and Cl is the dominant monovalent anion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207