Experimental Measurements of Bitumen–Water Aquathermolysis during a Steam-Injection Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laboratory studies and pilot project tests have shown that appreciable amounts of H 2 S and CO 2 could be generated as a result of the aquathermolysis reaction between bitumen and steam or hot water during thermal recovery operations. A detailed experimental study was carried out to investigate the H 2 S generation mechanism that occurs during the recovery processes. A laboratory setup was designed and assembled that allowed for aquathermolysis tests to be carried out under controlled pressure conditions and at temperatures to 250 °C. Aquathermolysis tests on a defined ratio of bitumen and water sample were carried out at 225 and 245 °C over 3, 10, and 30 day reaction periods. Phase sampling and analysis procedures were developed to quantify the amount of H 2 S and CO 2 generated during the individual vapor and aqueous phases. Vapor- and liquid-phase composition and bitumen properties, including viscosity and density, were analyzed after each reaction. The results of the investigation showed that the amount of H 2 S and CO 2 generated increased with the reaction time and temperature and the CO 2 concentration tended to flatten out over the test period. Data generated during the study were used to develop a kinetic model on a laboratory scale for predicting the time and temperature effects on H 2 S and CO 2 production during the bitumen–steam/hot water aquathermolysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".