Adoption of knowledge management by Canadian housing charities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many researchers have focused on the adoption and associated challenges of knowledge management tools in the commercial construction sector. However, few have investigated the usage and effectiveness of such tools and their adoption in the non-profit sector. Accordingly, ongoing action research principles are used to provide insights into preferred types, challenges of adoption, and qualitative and quantitative impacts of utilising knowledge management tools in a large and a small Canadian housing charity. Preliminary results indicate preference towards a combination of information technology and non-information technology tools for both charities. Barriers included inadequate technical capability, time and financial constraints; and improved efficacy of organisational knowledge management practices. The paper contributes to the construction engineering management sphere in academia and industry by exploring the knowledge management theme through the application of action research methods. Future work focuses on developing a roadmap for knowledge management in construction non-profit volunteer organisations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it